It’s Wednesday, August 31st, 2016…but before we begin, submitted for your perusal, a slightly paraphrased, instantaneously-classic quote from Kevin Williamson writing at NRO:

A milquetoast Manhattan progressive reinvents himself as an angry nationalist, surrounds himself with a Star Wars cantina cast of exotic and sundry cretins and oddities, and then, after securing the GOP nomination, refuses to run an actual presidential campaign, spending more on payments to his own hotels than on actual politicking: According to the WaPo, he spent more on Mar-a-Lago expenses in the past month alone than on his first campaign-ad buy…On Planet Trump, truth is stranger than fiction.

You can say…

181662_600

that again!

Now, here’s The Gouge!

First up, three pictures worth far more than all the ignorant words uttered or written in defense of the indefensible:

sk082916dAPR20160829064618colin is a douchegmc14432320160830012500

FOX Sports‘ Jay Glazer echoes one of our thoughts on the true nature of Kaepernick’s plight:

Regardless of politics or not, he has a very, very big uphill battle to make this team,” Glazer said on FOX Sunday. “I’d be shocked if he’s on the 49ers by the time this season ends. It has nothing to do with political views whatsoever. He lost a ton of weight this offseason, had three surgeries, couldn’t work out, lost that double threat, that size-speed ratio. No political views, he just hasn’t been effective. He’s regressing as a player. I’d be shocked if he’s on this roster by the end of this year. He may not be on it in the next two weeks.”

Here’s the juice: what you’re truly witnessing is a spoiled, underperforming has-been looking for an excuse to explain his almost-certain release.  In other words, the substance of Kaepernick’s purported stance is about as real as the myth of the Gentle Giant that birthed…

hands up don't shoot lie

Black Lives Matter.

Since we’re on the subject of purposeful Progressive misperception versus reality, writing at Best of the Web, James Taranto offers the unvarnished truth behind…

Trump and the Facts

His detractors commit empirical overstretch.

 

0cc3d6db9232ee09e603de028b6234e7

“…Trump has been attempting to appeal to black voters, who since 1964 have supported Democrats by overwhelming margins. (Fat lot of good it’s done them!) As noted here, it started two weeks ago in a speech at West Bend, Wis. His campaign took criticism for delivering the message in a mostly white Milwaukee suburb, and it appears to have taken the critique to heart: The Hill reports that over the weekend, Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway told radio host John Catsimatidis: “We’re planning on additional events in communities of color.”

Last week, as CBS’s Sopan Deb reported, Trump made his appeal again, in blunt and hyperbolic terms:

You can go to war zones in countries that we’re fighting and it’s safer than living in some of our inner cities…I ask you this. Crime. All of the problems. To the African Americans who I employ so many—so many people. To the Hispanics, tremendous people—what the hell do you have to lose? Give me a chance. I’ll straighten it out…You’ll be able to walk down the street without getting shot. Right now, you walk down the street. You get shot.

…“Donald Trump’s new message to African American voters isn’t just inaccurate, it’s outrageous,” proclaimed Mrs. Clinton’s campaign on its website. But neither that page nor the Marshall statement offered a single fact in support of the claim that Trump’s assertion about the conditions of inner cities was inaccurate. (Incredibly inarticulate, yes; inaccuratehardly!) The rejoinder was pure ad hominem—an enumeration of objectionable things Trump had (actually or allegedly) said or done before.

To be sure, the ultimate question in an election campaign is which candidate voters should prefer, so that in the big picture ad hominem arguments are relevant. But they are not relevant to the particular claim Trump was making here.

The openly and notoriously anti-Trump New York Times offered a more sophisticated rebuttal. “The unrelievedly dire picture [Trump] has painted of black America has left many black voters angry, dumbfounded or both,” reported Richard Fausset, Alan Blinder and John Eligon in Thursday’s paper. “Interviews with roughly a dozen blacks here [in Atlanta] turned up no one who found any appeal in Mr. Trump’s remarks.”

This passage caught our attention:

Marc Morial, the president of the National Urban League, said that black Americans faced challenges, but that Mr. Trump’s depiction of a hopeless, violent black America did not match reality.

“It’s an inaccurate portrayal of the community that seeks to define the community by only its biggest challenges,” Mr. Morial said. “Black America has deep problems—deep economic problems—but black America also has a large community of striving, successful, hard-working people: college educated, in the work force.”

really-seth-and-amy

That gave us a hunch, which we confirmed in seconds using the great hunch-verifying machine Google. This is from a New Orleans Times-Picayune story dated May 17, 2016:

For 40 years the National Urban League has documented the great divide between the social and economic prosperity of white and black Americans. And for 40 years the story has remained much the same, said Marc Morial, the league’s president and CEO.

Black people continue to trail white residents in every category the league tracks, presenting “a persistent racial disparity in American life,” that might as well equate to a reversal of fortune for strides toward equality made after the Civil Rights era of the 1960s, he said.

“The similarities of the United States of 1976 and the United States of 2016 are profoundly striking,” Morial said. “We are now, as we were then, a nation struggling to overcome the greatest economic downturn since the Great Depression. All gears have been thrown into reverse.”

That’s quite a change in three months!

But what changed, exactly? Surely not the underlying facts. Probably some annual statistics were updated between May and August, but we are unaware of any that showed a sudden and dramatic improvement. In any case, social change is a slow process. A sudden change could be the start of a long-term trend, or it could be a mere anomaly.

It’s possible that Morial’s knowledge of the facts has expanded in the past three months. But it seems unlikely. He is an expert on the condition of black America, and as such he undoubtedly knew almost as much about the subject in May as he knows today.

The likeliest explanation is the obvious one: Trump’s challenging words prompted Morial to change the way he thinks about the same set of facts. Now he accentuates the positive, and he frames the problems of black America as “challenges” rather than grievances.

That can make a big difference. To see why, think about your own life. Remember a time when you had a problem that began as a justified grievance. Perhaps the passage of time wore down your anger, or maybe somebody said something startling that led you to an epiphany. Either way, you solved the problem by changing the way you thought about it.

The facts mattered far less than your attitude toward them. That’s often true in politics as well.

Put more succinctly, Marc Morial can race-hustle…

Poll-Image

with the best of ’em…with nary a care for the people he purportedly represents!

Turning from the unpalatable to the utterly indigestible, Commentary Magazine‘s Noah Rothman details how Hillary…

Clinton Can’t Escape Obama’s Legacy

 

obama-hillary-1



Archives